If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. https://blogfreely.net/gonglegal04/how-far-away-can-one-particular-be-from-some-sort-of-5g-mobile-tower-system is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. safe distance from cell tower have also shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, Click for source and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.